What?
After reading back through my blogs, I found the ZPD(zone of proximal development) and scaffolding the most fascinating. I've always wondered how school impacts a child's upbringing: exactly how much of what people know about the world comes from school. Although I don't know percentages of what is learned from parents and what is learned from teachers, I can reflect back on what I've learned at school and recognize that I was always being taught with my ZPD. Math class comes readily to mind when reflecting on how I learn things. When I'd observe a teacher's lessons and examples on the board, it really didn't come to me. It was out of my scope of things I could do independently. When I got with a teacher/parent outside of class, I could learn easier because the one person I'd be with at that point could explain it in a way that I could understand. After getting so far behind without the luxury of having extra time to spend one on one with a teacher, I lost confidence in my mathematical abilities. I think I especially struggled in math when my parents couldn't help me with my homework anymore. I also think that scaffolding is a very important concept in the ways of history. Teachers must relate historical topics to what students already understand about the world around them.
So what?
I think I already explainted this in the first paragraph. It was kind of blended. Teachers should take more one on one time with students, especially in mathematics, and history teachers need to use scaffolding to ensure that students can continue to add upon what they already know.
Now what?
I'm going to have this zpd thing in mind, because it's how children learn, from my estimation anyway. It's a teachers goal to get students through this cycle so they have knowledge pertinent to the curriculum independent of any other person.
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Chapter 10 Blog
What's going on with modeling?
Vigotsky probably likes the whole view of modeling, because it goes along well with his established theories. A role of teachers will be modeling for their students, because students will want to model the teacher's behavior. If a teacher is treating someone disrespectfully, it's natural that the students will begin to treat the teacher and their fellow students disrespectfully also. On the other hand, a teacher demonstrating respect for their students will more likely ensure that the students will be respectful.
So what?
There are four effects listed on how modeling affects behavior: observational learning effect, response facilitation effect, response inhibition effect, and response disinhibition effect. The response effects have to do with whether or not a student being observed by another student is rewarded for good behavior or punished for bad behavior. If someone sees someone get away with something, the observer will be likely to display that behavior also.
Now what?
I think teachers need to get involved with the parents to let the parents know what is expected of them. That way, if Johnny needs to do some reading to catch up in class, the teacher can arrange with the parents of Johnny to set a good example of reading in the home. A teacher must be very careful to not be bias and use the same reinforcements for all students in the class.
Vigotsky probably likes the whole view of modeling, because it goes along well with his established theories. A role of teachers will be modeling for their students, because students will want to model the teacher's behavior. If a teacher is treating someone disrespectfully, it's natural that the students will begin to treat the teacher and their fellow students disrespectfully also. On the other hand, a teacher demonstrating respect for their students will more likely ensure that the students will be respectful.
So what?
There are four effects listed on how modeling affects behavior: observational learning effect, response facilitation effect, response inhibition effect, and response disinhibition effect. The response effects have to do with whether or not a student being observed by another student is rewarded for good behavior or punished for bad behavior. If someone sees someone get away with something, the observer will be likely to display that behavior also.
Now what?
I think teachers need to get involved with the parents to let the parents know what is expected of them. That way, if Johnny needs to do some reading to catch up in class, the teacher can arrange with the parents of Johnny to set a good example of reading in the home. A teacher must be very careful to not be bias and use the same reinforcements for all students in the class.
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Discovery Math at Lone Peak
Why do we do this?
This seems to be a more applicable kind of math that students learn in traditional schools. It uses more story problems to make more real-life comparisons using mathematics. I've definitely thought on these lines as I've wondered to myself if the things I learned in my traditional math classes would ever be repeated in a future career. Students use the discovery in trial and method as they try to figure out more difficult math concepts.
So what?
Lone Peak High school has an AP calcus math class based on the trial method. The class has created a lot of uproard because a smaller amount of students at this high school are passing the AP calculus math test. What are they learning if they're not being prepared to take the most important math test of their high-school careers? Even a BYU professor mentioned that while the program meets State math standards, it's "too much play and not enough work." My research has shown that there are some supporters of the program in the ranks of the math teachers in Alpine School District, but the majority of people seem to be saying it's not doing enough for preparing kids for what they'll need to know for state exams.
Now what?
They'll have to do some comparing of the discovery math program and traditional math programs. I think it's nice that teachers and administration are looking for ways to boost the amount of people that think that math has no applicable purpose in the real world. It's important for teachers to make those connections and have students enjoy math.
This seems to be a more applicable kind of math that students learn in traditional schools. It uses more story problems to make more real-life comparisons using mathematics. I've definitely thought on these lines as I've wondered to myself if the things I learned in my traditional math classes would ever be repeated in a future career. Students use the discovery in trial and method as they try to figure out more difficult math concepts.
So what?
Lone Peak High school has an AP calcus math class based on the trial method. The class has created a lot of uproard because a smaller amount of students at this high school are passing the AP calculus math test. What are they learning if they're not being prepared to take the most important math test of their high-school careers? Even a BYU professor mentioned that while the program meets State math standards, it's "too much play and not enough work." My research has shown that there are some supporters of the program in the ranks of the math teachers in Alpine School District, but the majority of people seem to be saying it's not doing enough for preparing kids for what they'll need to know for state exams.
Now what?
They'll have to do some comparing of the discovery math program and traditional math programs. I think it's nice that teachers and administration are looking for ways to boost the amount of people that think that math has no applicable purpose in the real world. It's important for teachers to make those connections and have students enjoy math.
Research Article
What's going on with this here research article?
I found this one on the internet that is called "Kids With Down Syndrome Learn Language Behind Adolescence." It focuses on language development of down-syndrome children. For years psychologists have assumed that language learning for down-syndrome kids plateaus in the teenage years. It is true that language abilities for down-syndrome children varies moreso than normal children, but recent research has found that those language abilitities continue to improve into the young adult years.
So what with this new research?
With the assumed research of the last twenty years or so, teachers would ease off teaching more language skills to down-syndrome children. This kind of holds them back in a way, because they don't get enough opportunities to express themselves. When vocabulary and grammar aren't taught during this period of time, down-sydndrome children find it difficult to express themselves in social situations. Grammar and vocabulary should be continued to be taught to these exceptional students. It's also important to maintain the skills already learned during childhood.
Now what?
Chapman, the conductor of the study, mentions that down-syndrome children can accomplish a lot and that they shouldn't be held back because of a disability. It would take a good amount of government funding to have more qualified teachers teach a curriculum for this type of learner, but children with down-syndrome children will be able to be more successful linguistically, but overall.
I found this one on the internet that is called "Kids With Down Syndrome Learn Language Behind Adolescence." It focuses on language development of down-syndrome children. For years psychologists have assumed that language learning for down-syndrome kids plateaus in the teenage years. It is true that language abilities for down-syndrome children varies moreso than normal children, but recent research has found that those language abilitities continue to improve into the young adult years.
So what with this new research?
With the assumed research of the last twenty years or so, teachers would ease off teaching more language skills to down-syndrome children. This kind of holds them back in a way, because they don't get enough opportunities to express themselves. When vocabulary and grammar aren't taught during this period of time, down-sydndrome children find it difficult to express themselves in social situations. Grammar and vocabulary should be continued to be taught to these exceptional students. It's also important to maintain the skills already learned during childhood.
Now what?
Chapman, the conductor of the study, mentions that down-syndrome children can accomplish a lot and that they shouldn't be held back because of a disability. It would take a good amount of government funding to have more qualified teachers teach a curriculum for this type of learner, but children with down-syndrome children will be able to be more successful linguistically, but overall.
Fertile Minds-Extra credit
What's going on in this article?
New brain research has shown that brain activity starts a lot earlier in an embryo than previous though. Neuron activity is taking place at an amazing rate of speed. Children's brains are also more active at a young age, so it's important to continuously teach children in their early years, because they're more able to adapt to new situations and environments. No wonder it's so easy for little kids to learn a language at first.
So what?
Since the first 3 years are the fastest for rapid brain growth, it's important for parents to feed childrens' brains with good experiences. Children can often experience trauma due to how they were treated in those first three years of mortality. It's also important to stimulate the brain in a variety of activities: playing with children, as well as singing and talking to them. It's also important for these children to play. The whole experiment with the labrats was interesting, because the labrats who had the toys in their cages were more likely to have better brain activity. Daycares aren't the best way to raise kids, because it takes them away from an environment that i s critical to them learning with their parents.
Now what?
In the very end of the article it talks about how children should learn foreign languages when they're younger. Brain activity at a young age helps children learn something even advances as a foreign language. The brain is growing at such a fast rate that the best time for foreign language learning would take place at the age of six. That's incredible!
New brain research has shown that brain activity starts a lot earlier in an embryo than previous though. Neuron activity is taking place at an amazing rate of speed. Children's brains are also more active at a young age, so it's important to continuously teach children in their early years, because they're more able to adapt to new situations and environments. No wonder it's so easy for little kids to learn a language at first.
So what?
Since the first 3 years are the fastest for rapid brain growth, it's important for parents to feed childrens' brains with good experiences. Children can often experience trauma due to how they were treated in those first three years of mortality. It's also important to stimulate the brain in a variety of activities: playing with children, as well as singing and talking to them. It's also important for these children to play. The whole experiment with the labrats was interesting, because the labrats who had the toys in their cages were more likely to have better brain activity. Daycares aren't the best way to raise kids, because it takes them away from an environment that i s critical to them learning with their parents.
Now what?
In the very end of the article it talks about how children should learn foreign languages when they're younger. Brain activity at a young age helps children learn something even advances as a foreign language. The brain is growing at such a fast rate that the best time for foreign language learning would take place at the age of six. That's incredible!
Chapter 2 Blog
1. What's this nonsense I'm hearing about zone of proximal development(ZPD)?
Well, I'll tell you what that nonsense is. The zone of proximal development is a range of the tasks that a student can perform with the guidance of others, but can't quite hack it independently.
2. So what with this zpd?
If there's some good teacher and student supervision going on, a child can take their range of proximal development and put that task into a category where they can perform it all by themselves. A child needs to go through a that range to continually learn experiences that are necessary for their upbringing. A teacher needs to have a keen eye for things that a student still can't do on their own.
3. Now what?
Teachers need to assign some tasks that students can accomplish successfully with someone else's support. Teachers and older students can help out with that. Students will also need assignments that are designed specifically for their individual ranges. They can't be given assignments that don't challenge them but shouldn't be given students they can't accomplish even without some supervision, ya know what i'm saying?
Well, I'll tell you what that nonsense is. The zone of proximal development is a range of the tasks that a student can perform with the guidance of others, but can't quite hack it independently.
2. So what with this zpd?
If there's some good teacher and student supervision going on, a child can take their range of proximal development and put that task into a category where they can perform it all by themselves. A child needs to go through a that range to continually learn experiences that are necessary for their upbringing. A teacher needs to have a keen eye for things that a student still can't do on their own.
3. Now what?
Teachers need to assign some tasks that students can accomplish successfully with someone else's support. Teachers and older students can help out with that. Students will also need assignments that are designed specifically for their individual ranges. They can't be given assignments that don't challenge them but shouldn't be given students they can't accomplish even without some supervision, ya know what i'm saying?
Chapter 5 blog on intelligence
What is this measuring intelligence stuff?
Well, I'll tell ya. Measuring intelligence is kind of a big deal in the secondary education lifestyle. Scores on standardized tests can set the stage for life by determining what schools a student will be able to attend. There are other kinds of intelligence tests too. The IQ test was created to help determine if a student had any disablities. If scores are very low on an IQ test in all areas, experts can determine that a student is mentally retarded. That student may be put in the classes he/she needs to develop socially and academically. The IQ test is a widely accepted way of measuring intelligence even though it has some flaws. Psychologists are still debating what intelligence even means.
Why is this important to schools?
Believe it or not, research shows that high IQ stores often have correlation with high school achievement, completion of years of college after the high-school level, and scores on standardized achievement scores. I'm one of the exceptions. I score rather high on IQ tests, but the only standardized test i ever took, I only scored close to average. Teachers could use an IQ test to help determine school achievement, but they shouldn't rely on it as a scepter of truth.
Now what?
IQ tests will continue to be used, but i think people place too much emphasis on them. As for standardized tests, it seems like the best method we have right now to give everyone an equal chance to get into good colleges and all that. Students with test-anxiety are obviously at a disadvantage, so it's not standardized in a perfect sense.
Well, I'll tell ya. Measuring intelligence is kind of a big deal in the secondary education lifestyle. Scores on standardized tests can set the stage for life by determining what schools a student will be able to attend. There are other kinds of intelligence tests too. The IQ test was created to help determine if a student had any disablities. If scores are very low on an IQ test in all areas, experts can determine that a student is mentally retarded. That student may be put in the classes he/she needs to develop socially and academically. The IQ test is a widely accepted way of measuring intelligence even though it has some flaws. Psychologists are still debating what intelligence even means.
Why is this important to schools?
Believe it or not, research shows that high IQ stores often have correlation with high school achievement, completion of years of college after the high-school level, and scores on standardized achievement scores. I'm one of the exceptions. I score rather high on IQ tests, but the only standardized test i ever took, I only scored close to average. Teachers could use an IQ test to help determine school achievement, but they shouldn't rely on it as a scepter of truth.
Now what?
IQ tests will continue to be used, but i think people place too much emphasis on them. As for standardized tests, it seems like the best method we have right now to give everyone an equal chance to get into good colleges and all that. Students with test-anxiety are obviously at a disadvantage, so it's not standardized in a perfect sense.
Chapter 3 Blog
What the doozy is Erikson's development model doohicky?
Erikson's model of social development is studied to understand the social developmental changes in people from infancy to retirement years. People have different choices they need to make at each age, so that they can develop into efficient human beings. This model of social development outlines the changes that people need to make at different stages of their life?
What does this have to do with a secondary education classroom?
The students i'll be dealing with are in the identity versus role confusion bracket. Students are going to act differently to find their identity. This has positive and negative consequences. Some students will try to find their identity by being really obnoxious while they experiment with gaining attention from those around them. Other students may get depressed because they don't have a group of friends to fit in with. Students who adjust to this stage are usually more driven and have made some goals to work towards to.
What am I going to do with this lovely knowledge?
-I'll be patient with different stages that students are going through. No one progresses the same, so I'll need to pay attention to personal circumstances of my students. I can also be a model by treating them with respect, and maybe they'll get the idea not to stick tacs on peoples' chairs and stuff. I can also give them views into different careers they're thinking about working towards.
Erikson's model of social development is studied to understand the social developmental changes in people from infancy to retirement years. People have different choices they need to make at each age, so that they can develop into efficient human beings. This model of social development outlines the changes that people need to make at different stages of their life?
What does this have to do with a secondary education classroom?
The students i'll be dealing with are in the identity versus role confusion bracket. Students are going to act differently to find their identity. This has positive and negative consequences. Some students will try to find their identity by being really obnoxious while they experiment with gaining attention from those around them. Other students may get depressed because they don't have a group of friends to fit in with. Students who adjust to this stage are usually more driven and have made some goals to work towards to.
What am I going to do with this lovely knowledge?
-I'll be patient with different stages that students are going through. No one progresses the same, so I'll need to pay attention to personal circumstances of my students. I can also be a model by treating them with respect, and maybe they'll get the idea not to stick tacs on peoples' chairs and stuff. I can also give them views into different careers they're thinking about working towards.
Chapter 7-scaffolding
What the devil is scaffolding?
Scaffolding allows students to build upon their own theories of aspects of the world to bring those theories closer to what is real in the world. Children have their own set of schemas on how they personally see the world. Sometimes, these theories are inaccurate and may keep the students from understanding vital concepts of curriculum.
So what? An example appropriate use of scaffolding is evolution. There are a lot of students that shutter at the very word of evolution. It's been proven that animals adapt to the environments around them, but the very mention of "evolution" could keep students from grasping this basic concept. Their original schema is that there is no revolution, so it's important for a science teacher to talk about this in a way that the student can hold on to their religious beliefs AND understand science.
Now what?
Teachers have a variety of options to help them use scaffolding properly. Teachers need their students to ask "why" and "how" questions. Close ended questions are definitely not the most effective way to teach at a secondary level. Students start to think outside of the box as they get older. Those new skills need to be put to use for students to understand why things happen. It's especially important in history to understand the how's and why's, because history is more than just a regurgitation(sic) of facts. Students need to ask those particular questions about past events, so they can understand current events and potential events.
Scaffolding allows students to build upon their own theories of aspects of the world to bring those theories closer to what is real in the world. Children have their own set of schemas on how they personally see the world. Sometimes, these theories are inaccurate and may keep the students from understanding vital concepts of curriculum.
So what? An example appropriate use of scaffolding is evolution. There are a lot of students that shutter at the very word of evolution. It's been proven that animals adapt to the environments around them, but the very mention of "evolution" could keep students from grasping this basic concept. Their original schema is that there is no revolution, so it's important for a science teacher to talk about this in a way that the student can hold on to their religious beliefs AND understand science.
Now what?
Teachers have a variety of options to help them use scaffolding properly. Teachers need their students to ask "why" and "how" questions. Close ended questions are definitely not the most effective way to teach at a secondary level. Students start to think outside of the box as they get older. Those new skills need to be put to use for students to understand why things happen. It's especially important in history to understand the how's and why's, because history is more than just a regurgitation(sic) of facts. Students need to ask those particular questions about past events, so they can understand current events and potential events.
Chapter 9 Log
What on Earth is conditioning?
- It's as simple as learning. That's what students are doing in classrooms every day, being conditioned to learn. Conditioning can focus on different stimulis that the teacher provides to get the effective response, students understanding the curriculum. Students are also how to behave properly and respectfully if the teacher uses conditioning as he/she should.
So what?
In the classroom, if a student needs to behave themselves, a teacher can use a form of conditioning called cueing to realize that there are rewards for behaving well. The teacher can positively reinforce someone for raising their hand respectfully by saying, "Thanks Johnny for raising your hand" as the teacher throws Johnny some candy. The students will then know that they will get candy for being respectful to the teacher and other students by raising their hand. It's not a big thing for a teacher to give a little piece of candy to the students if that shapes behavior that will reflect positively in the classroom environment. It's as easy as A,B, and D.
Now what?
There are innumerous examples of how a teacher can condition his/her students to behave properly and learn curriculum. It's important for the teacher not to ruin intrinsic motivation of students while trying to motivate them. A good teacher will give students intrinsic reinforcers so the student can continue proper behavior in the future. The extrinsic reinforcers, like candy, and stuff will not be around when the student gets to high school and college, so it's important to help students set goals for themselves.
- It's as simple as learning. That's what students are doing in classrooms every day, being conditioned to learn. Conditioning can focus on different stimulis that the teacher provides to get the effective response, students understanding the curriculum. Students are also how to behave properly and respectfully if the teacher uses conditioning as he/she should.
So what?
In the classroom, if a student needs to behave themselves, a teacher can use a form of conditioning called cueing to realize that there are rewards for behaving well. The teacher can positively reinforce someone for raising their hand respectfully by saying, "Thanks Johnny for raising your hand" as the teacher throws Johnny some candy. The students will then know that they will get candy for being respectful to the teacher and other students by raising their hand. It's not a big thing for a teacher to give a little piece of candy to the students if that shapes behavior that will reflect positively in the classroom environment. It's as easy as A,B, and D.
Now what?
There are innumerous examples of how a teacher can condition his/her students to behave properly and learn curriculum. It's important for the teacher not to ruin intrinsic motivation of students while trying to motivate them. A good teacher will give students intrinsic reinforcers so the student can continue proper behavior in the future. The extrinsic reinforcers, like candy, and stuff will not be around when the student gets to high school and college, so it's important to help students set goals for themselves.
Chapter 1 learning blog
What??
This chapter was about the variety of methods in which educucational psychologists conduct research. Every method of research has its advantages. The methods of research are: descriptive, experimental, and correlational. They have to be used accurately to give the best results. Another kind of study is action research. This is where a teacher can take matters into their own hands. Action research can be conducted to address issues and problems in their schools. Correlational study focuses on two variables and how they're conducted. Descriptive studies enable researchers to draw conclusions about the currents state of affairs(how many students where socks that match). These studies are cheap, because all the information is right in front of you. Experimental studies' findings are very valuable, but experiments are more expensive to conduct, and there has to be a control and treatment group.
So what?
Teachers can be participants and organizers in these different kinds of studies to figure out the best methods to teach their students. They can find out if their current methods are working to help their students understand curriculum. If they conduct these studies and find out that the methods aren't matching up with students' understanding, then they can try and modify their current methods and phsychology.
Now what?
These kinds of studies can take a long time to conduct and pull results from. A teacher should not get overhwelmed with all these studies, but they can use them intermittedly in class activities and to find out about the different students in their class.
This chapter was about the variety of methods in which educucational psychologists conduct research. Every method of research has its advantages. The methods of research are: descriptive, experimental, and correlational. They have to be used accurately to give the best results. Another kind of study is action research. This is where a teacher can take matters into their own hands. Action research can be conducted to address issues and problems in their schools. Correlational study focuses on two variables and how they're conducted. Descriptive studies enable researchers to draw conclusions about the currents state of affairs(how many students where socks that match). These studies are cheap, because all the information is right in front of you. Experimental studies' findings are very valuable, but experiments are more expensive to conduct, and there has to be a control and treatment group.
So what?
Teachers can be participants and organizers in these different kinds of studies to figure out the best methods to teach their students. They can find out if their current methods are working to help their students understand curriculum. If they conduct these studies and find out that the methods aren't matching up with students' understanding, then they can try and modify their current methods and phsychology.
Now what?
These kinds of studies can take a long time to conduct and pull results from. A teacher should not get overhwelmed with all these studies, but they can use them intermittedly in class activities and to find out about the different students in their class.
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Extra credit- gender and racial Bias
I had never seen any tests like that before in my life. I found the racial bias test to be a little more difficult than gender bias. It said I had a slight bias towards white people, and the gender bias test said i made no association between the 2. I really don't know the science behind how they come up with how racist someone is by taking that test. I don't think values and culture bias can be measured by a test like that. Isn't the real test in how people treat others in cultures besides their own?
The reason I say the cultural test is harder is that it uses associations beyond just black and white people. An average person growing up is going to associate good words with light and bad words with darkness. It doesn't have anything to do with people. It's a religious and philosophical understanding making that association. But then again, maybe these do measure something, and they can predict cultural and gender bias. I'd have to see a wide array of results and see if they have any correlation with whether or not the person taking the test is Black, White, Hispanic, Chinese, etc. Anyway, in the words of Forrest Gump, "that's all i gotta say about that."
The reason I say the cultural test is harder is that it uses associations beyond just black and white people. An average person growing up is going to associate good words with light and bad words with darkness. It doesn't have anything to do with people. It's a religious and philosophical understanding making that association. But then again, maybe these do measure something, and they can predict cultural and gender bias. I'd have to see a wide array of results and see if they have any correlation with whether or not the person taking the test is Black, White, Hispanic, Chinese, etc. Anyway, in the words of Forrest Gump, "that's all i gotta say about that."
RAD TEACHING
What? RAD is an acronym for a concept involving Reticular Activating System(RAS), Amygdala, and Dopamine. The RAS is located at the brainstem and serves as our attention activating system. Teachers must have the concept of grasping student's attention by providing a variety of activities. The Amygdala is what triggers positive emotion in the brain, and dopamine is a neurotransmitter that increases pleasure, attention, and memory.
So what? I find it true that the best learning memories come from having a positive emotion at that particular time. This is why I find Ken Burns' history documentaries so thrilling is that he combines photos and music to illicit a certain emotional response. I find myself back in Civil War times like a soldier in the war because the way he combines visual and auditory images. That's the most beneficial thing out of this RAD concept. An effective history teacher takes students out of their personal norms and lifetyles and transplants them back tens, hundreds, or even thousands of years ago.
Now What? Teachers should take the latest education courses to learn how to come away from everyday lecturing and incorporate multi-sensory application. The only way to learn from the past is helping students become a part of history then they'll know better how the past effects the future.
So what? I find it true that the best learning memories come from having a positive emotion at that particular time. This is why I find Ken Burns' history documentaries so thrilling is that he combines photos and music to illicit a certain emotional response. I find myself back in Civil War times like a soldier in the war because the way he combines visual and auditory images. That's the most beneficial thing out of this RAD concept. An effective history teacher takes students out of their personal norms and lifetyles and transplants them back tens, hundreds, or even thousands of years ago.
Now What? Teachers should take the latest education courses to learn how to come away from everyday lecturing and incorporate multi-sensory application. The only way to learn from the past is helping students become a part of history then they'll know better how the past effects the future.
Monday, November 10, 2008
Extra credit-brain guys
1. John Ratey has written books on how exercise influences students for the better in the classroom. He explains that although exercise does not make one smarter, it does put peoples’ brains in an optimal condition to learn. He also calls exercise “ADHD medication without side effects.
2. There has been a debate in the last 10 years on whether or not exercise has a positive effect on learning. The latest research indicates that there is a positive correlation between the two. It makes sense to me that there is a correlation. Exercise seems to wake up my brain, and it gets my blood flowing so I can focus better on material presented in the classroom. It relieves stress in the body that allows students to concentrate better and not be jittery.
3. Now what? Well, I’m sure research will continue. I’m actually surprised that researchers haven’t come to this conclusion sooner. Hasn’t the positive correlation between exercise and learning been demonstrated for decades? I think that’s the reason elementary students are allowed an hour and a half of recess every day. Isn’t that why teachers will have students stand up and stretch in the middle of long lectures? Come on, people. Exercise is good for any learner!
2. There has been a debate in the last 10 years on whether or not exercise has a positive effect on learning. The latest research indicates that there is a positive correlation between the two. It makes sense to me that there is a correlation. Exercise seems to wake up my brain, and it gets my blood flowing so I can focus better on material presented in the classroom. It relieves stress in the body that allows students to concentrate better and not be jittery.
3. Now what? Well, I’m sure research will continue. I’m actually surprised that researchers haven’t come to this conclusion sooner. Hasn’t the positive correlation between exercise and learning been demonstrated for decades? I think that’s the reason elementary students are allowed an hour and a half of recess every day. Isn’t that why teachers will have students stand up and stretch in the middle of long lectures? Come on, people. Exercise is good for any learner!
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Homework Blog
At first, this article was just as the name of the periodical implied: ornery. Orson Scott Card had a really whiney tone at the beginning, but by the end of the article, I sympathized with his opinions more. I've always thought that homework had meaningful influence on a child's grade, however, thinking back on my own experiences with homework in middle school and high school, I see that homework was more of a pain than a help. If I understood a concept in class and went home and did 30 problems of the same concept, I'd get quite annoyed with doing the same thing over and over. Sometimes I didn't understand the concept in class, so I'd go home and stare at my homework for hours. That can be a humiliating experience coming back to class the next day. A teacher obviously has to keep up with what the district needs him/her to teach, so students who don't understand something can be left further and further behind as time progresses. A teacher is expected to keep students on track to take a test at the end of the semester, but good teachers know how to personalize along the way. My idea of an excellent teacher is one who takes kids aside one on one to see what they know and don't know. If the student doesn't understand a concept, the teacher can explain it then to help the student understand. The teacher can then assign a few problems that deal with what is being taught in class. Having the problem explained clearly to them, the student can go home and work on ONLY 2 to 3 problems that will help them cement concepts. If a student already knows and is caught up with the concepts, NO homework. Of course, it's hard to have interview time with 150 students per semester, but they don't have to take a long time, and teachers can ask short questions to understand if a student grasps concepts.
I like the concept of no homework in elementary school. I don't remember doing homework that much in elementary school anyway. I agree with Card that students should only be assigned homework that has an objective purpose to what is being done in class and that students shouldn't need their parents' help to do homework. I do agree with a lot of points in the article, but I still think that homework is necessary to an extent. Teachers do need to be observant of what their students are already doing before they assign homework.
I like the concept of no homework in elementary school. I don't remember doing homework that much in elementary school anyway. I agree with Card that students should only be assigned homework that has an objective purpose to what is being done in class and that students shouldn't need their parents' help to do homework. I do agree with a lot of points in the article, but I still think that homework is necessary to an extent. Teachers do need to be observant of what their students are already doing before they assign homework.
Intelligence Test
IQ TEST
I've taken the IQ test a few times in my life, and i think i ended up with the same score each time. It seems to be a very similar test as the one I took for this assignment. That goes to show that this kind of test can measure someone consistently over a long period of time. I think the test is quite a bit different from a realistic IQ test. I don't i've ever taken a real one before. I just don't think a real IQ test would be on the internet for free.
Multiple Intelligence Test
The results of this test didn't really surprise me. 6 out of 8 attributes of the test were near identical in score while I had interpersonal and linguistic branch out a bit more than the others. I am more naturalistic than I thought I was. I don't know a lot about birds, trees, and other animals. The order of my intelligences of greatest to least are: interpersonal, linquistic, naturalistic, logical, intrapersonal, and musical, kinesthetic, and visual/spacial are all tied.
Would I use these tests?
I would use the IQ test to determine if someone needs to identify people with special needs. Beyond that, I think it is pointless to students in a general education setting. I have a differing opinion with the multiple intelligence test. I think a teacher could use the pie graph to determine how to reach different students with different abilities. This would be something handy to include in a portfolio in case a student in struggling. The teacher can go out of his/her way to accommodate different learning styles and still make sure students are understanding the curriculum. I found out a lot by myself just by going through this test, and I think that process would be important for teachers to find out about their students as well.
I've taken the IQ test a few times in my life, and i think i ended up with the same score each time. It seems to be a very similar test as the one I took for this assignment. That goes to show that this kind of test can measure someone consistently over a long period of time. I think the test is quite a bit different from a realistic IQ test. I don't i've ever taken a real one before. I just don't think a real IQ test would be on the internet for free.
Multiple Intelligence Test
The results of this test didn't really surprise me. 6 out of 8 attributes of the test were near identical in score while I had interpersonal and linguistic branch out a bit more than the others. I am more naturalistic than I thought I was. I don't know a lot about birds, trees, and other animals. The order of my intelligences of greatest to least are: interpersonal, linquistic, naturalistic, logical, intrapersonal, and musical, kinesthetic, and visual/spacial are all tied.
Would I use these tests?
I would use the IQ test to determine if someone needs to identify people with special needs. Beyond that, I think it is pointless to students in a general education setting. I have a differing opinion with the multiple intelligence test. I think a teacher could use the pie graph to determine how to reach different students with different abilities. This would be something handy to include in a portfolio in case a student in struggling. The teacher can go out of his/her way to accommodate different learning styles and still make sure students are understanding the curriculum. I found out a lot by myself just by going through this test, and I think that process would be important for teachers to find out about their students as well.
Friday, September 19, 2008
Multicultural Education
1. What is it?
- A panel of educational researchers from around the country met together in a panel to determine how to make a better environment for multicultural students. They came up with 11 principles to help teachers, students, and administration come together and accommodate students who speak different languages, have a variety of ethnicities, and need to understand each other’s culture.
2. Why?
- Many of the problems, especially in urban areas, between students can center on intercultural tensions. This can create an unsafe environment, not only on the streets, but at school as well. One of the main issues in America is how to accommodate children who don’t speak English as their primary language. These children can be left behind socially and academically. This article was written to explore ways that could help all students have the same opportunities at school.
3. So what?
- These 11 principles, if followed, would create a great environment for learning no matter the different ethnicities that may exist. It looks very good on paper. They outline that students, as well as teachers, should be mindful and respectful to the different cultures. I’m anxious to see these 11 steps incorporated in schools.
4. Cite: http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/multicultural/bank.html
- A panel of educational researchers from around the country met together in a panel to determine how to make a better environment for multicultural students. They came up with 11 principles to help teachers, students, and administration come together and accommodate students who speak different languages, have a variety of ethnicities, and need to understand each other’s culture.
2. Why?
- Many of the problems, especially in urban areas, between students can center on intercultural tensions. This can create an unsafe environment, not only on the streets, but at school as well. One of the main issues in America is how to accommodate children who don’t speak English as their primary language. These children can be left behind socially and academically. This article was written to explore ways that could help all students have the same opportunities at school.
3. So what?
- These 11 principles, if followed, would create a great environment for learning no matter the different ethnicities that may exist. It looks very good on paper. They outline that students, as well as teachers, should be mindful and respectful to the different cultures. I’m anxious to see these 11 steps incorporated in schools.
4. Cite: http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/multicultural/bank.html
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Motivation
1. Why are I here?
I want to learn everything I can to help simulate scenarios inside a real life classroom. By learning now about those scenarios, I can prepare myself to become a full-time teacher. I have also recognized that I have character traits to interact with secondondary school aged children.
2. What motivates me?
Seeing improvement in other peoples' lives is my motivation, positive changes that is.
3. Why do I succeed?
I succeed because I see the big picture and am able to organize myself properly step by step to accompish my long term goals
4. Why do I fail?
I fail because sometimes I don't organize myself properly step by step. I become uninterested with something I'm pursuing and take the path of least resistance.
5. How do I need to change your perspective and/or motivations?
I need to have an open mind to change and accept the fact that I don't have all the right answers for any topic. I need to allow people to speak their own mind and incorporate whatever they say into my overall view of things.
I want to learn everything I can to help simulate scenarios inside a real life classroom. By learning now about those scenarios, I can prepare myself to become a full-time teacher. I have also recognized that I have character traits to interact with secondondary school aged children.
2. What motivates me?
Seeing improvement in other peoples' lives is my motivation, positive changes that is.
3. Why do I succeed?
I succeed because I see the big picture and am able to organize myself properly step by step to accompish my long term goals
4. Why do I fail?
I fail because sometimes I don't organize myself properly step by step. I become uninterested with something I'm pursuing and take the path of least resistance.
5. How do I need to change your perspective and/or motivations?
I need to have an open mind to change and accept the fact that I don't have all the right answers for any topic. I need to allow people to speak their own mind and incorporate whatever they say into my overall view of things.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)